ILO Working Paper 140 (2025): Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure
Task-level occupational exposure framework for generative AI, built from expert input and model predictions.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Costume design is character storytelling through clothes. AI generates visual concepts; costume designers research, create, and manage the wardrobes that actors inhabit.
Costume designers create the wardrobes for film, television, and theatre productions — researching historical and cultural accuracy, designing character-appropriate clothing, sourcing or manufacturing garments, and fitting them to specific actors. This is a creative discipline that combines fashion design, historical research, character psychology, and production management.
AI costume visualisation tools generate costume concept images. These are useful research and presentation tools.
But the costume designer who understands how clothing communicates social status and character psychology in a specific period, who fits a costume to an actor's specific body while accommodating stunt requirements and quick changes, who manages a wardrobe department running hundreds of costumes across a complex production — this is specialist creative work requiring deep research and practical skill.
Streaming production growth is creating demand for costume designers. Period drama specifically (Bridgerton, The Crown, Downton Abbey) drives significant demand for specialist historical costume expertise.
These are the genuine threats to this profession. They are real, but they are not sufficient to overturn the fundamental analysis. Here is why.
Put the case that Costume Designer will not survive AI displacement. The system responds with counterarguments from the research base. Strong arguments shift the score — up to a maximum of ±15 points. The system is not an AI. It is a structured argument engine.
This question layer is generated from the job verdict, the resistance case, the regional rollout logic, and the evidence status of this page. Use the filters to focus the discussion, or trigger a random question and work through the role from multiple angles.
Safe to present as a framework-level forecast, provided the page remains labelled as interpretive and source-grounded rather than certain.
TIER 3 review queue with 6 core sources and 3 framework signals.
This page is grounded in task exposure research and labour-market trend reports, then translated into a reasoned occupation-level argument.
This site now treats exact timelines, total job-loss counts, and regional speed as interpretive estimates unless a cited source states them directly. The argument on this page should be read as a structured forecast, not a guaranteed future.
These impact figures are site estimates for comparison and should not be read as official labour-market counts.
Task-level occupational exposure framework for generative AI, built from expert input and model predictions.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Finds clerical work is the most highly exposed occupational group and that augmentation is often more likely than full occupation automation.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Shows AI exposure is highest in many white-collar cognitive occupations, while manual occupations tend to have lower exposure.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Advanced economies are more exposed to AI because they have more cognitive-intensive jobs; infrastructure and skills limit adoption elsewhere.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Large-employer survey showing clerical roles among the fastest-declining and care, education, software and green-transition jobs among growth areas.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Argues advanced economies are better positioned to benefit from AI due to infrastructure, skills, and institutions.
OPEN SOURCE ↗