ILO Working Paper 140 (2025): Generative AI and Jobs: A Refined Global Index of Occupational Exposure
Task-level occupational exposure framework for generative AI, built from expert input and model predictions.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Family mediation involves human beings at their most vulnerable, making decisions about children and the rest of their lives. This is irreducibly human professional work.
Family mediators help separating and divorcing couples reach agreements about children, finances, and property without going to court. This is among the most emotionally demanding mediation work: clients are often in the rawest stages of grief, anger, and fear about their futures.
AI tools can calculate financial settlement scenarios, identify areas of legal agreement, and provide information about likely court outcomes. These might help parties understand what is realistically achievable before they come to mediation.
But the mediation process itself — sitting with two people who may be profoundly hurt and angry, helping them separate their emotional reaction from their decision-making about children, working with the parenting relationship they will need to maintain for the rest of their lives — requires a skilled human professional who can manage intense emotional dynamics with care.
Family mediation is growing: court backlogs in family law are extreme, and the government is actively promoting mediation to divert cases from the family court system.
These are the genuine threats to this profession. They are real, but they are not sufficient to overturn the fundamental analysis. Here is why.
Put the case that Family Mediator will not survive AI displacement. The system responds with counterarguments from the research base. Strong arguments shift the score — up to a maximum of ±15 points. The system is not an AI. It is a structured argument engine.
This question layer is generated from the job verdict, the resistance case, the regional rollout logic, and the evidence status of this page. Use the filters to focus the discussion, or trigger a random question and work through the role from multiple angles.
Replace broad inference with occupation-specific literature, regulators, labour statistics, or professional-body evidence before publication-grade use.
TIER 1 review queue with 6 core sources and 3 framework signals.
This page is grounded in task exposure research and labour-market trend reports, then translated into a reasoned occupation-level argument.
This site now treats exact timelines, total job-loss counts, and regional speed as interpretive estimates unless a cited source states them directly. The argument on this page should be read as a structured forecast, not a guaranteed future.
These impact figures are site estimates for comparison and should not be read as official labour-market counts.
Task-level occupational exposure framework for generative AI, built from expert input and model predictions.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Finds clerical work is the most highly exposed occupational group and that augmentation is often more likely than full occupation automation.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Shows AI exposure is highest in many white-collar cognitive occupations, while manual occupations tend to have lower exposure.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Advanced economies are more exposed to AI because they have more cognitive-intensive jobs; infrastructure and skills limit adoption elsewhere.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Large-employer survey showing clerical roles among the fastest-declining and care, education, software and green-transition jobs among growth areas.
OPEN SOURCE ↗Argues advanced economies are better positioned to benefit from AI due to infrastructure, skills, and institutions.
OPEN SOURCE ↗